Decision Summary
Upload-ready calibration protocol overview
Instrument
P242s1
Session
1
Location
LabGSFC
Calibration person
Manuel Gebetsberger
CF file
C:/CalibrationAnalysisOperational/Blick-1.9.4/data/calresults/Pandora242s1/session1/Pandora242s1_CF_session1.txt
Software version
1.9.4 / 1.9.5
Calibration vector
-
Reference day
-
Overall status
development
O3Ext: Not answeredO3Synt: Not answeredNO2: Not answeredSO2: Not answeredHCHO: Not answeredH2O: Not answered
Action Timeline
33 action intervalsDuration by Step
Action Summary
| Action | Events | Runs | Aborted | Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AnalyzeBright | 17 | 2 | 1 | 9m 48s |
| AnalyzeDark | 21 | 2 | 0 | 4m 52s |
| CheckFilters | 4 | 1 | 0 | 6s |
| CheckNoiseWave | 6 | 1 | 0 | 34s |
| Convolution | 16 | 5 | 0 | 1m 28s |
| NDFilters | 3 | 1 | 1 | 6s |
| No action | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0s |
| SensitivityCalibration | 80 | 4 | 2 | 25s |
| StrayLight | 27 | 5 | 1 | 32s |
| TempDependence | 22 | 5 | 4 | 7m 12s |
| WavelengthCalibration | 21 | 6 | 1 | 3m 28s |
Session Figures
1 figure from Google Drive/figuresAutomatically harvested metadata
Automatically Harvested Metadata
Manual review and decision
Manual Review and Decision
Calibration notes, data-quality findings, and whole-period evaluation.Data Evaluation
Could there be an offset between VPs?
No
Are there breakpoint-analysis plots or suspicious discontinuities?
No
Do daily figures before and after the new VP look consistent?
No
Is there an AMF dependency for one or more VPs?
No
Is there seasonality, for example negative values in winter?
No
Does the daily shape follow the trop data roughly?
No
If there is a discrepancy, what are the DS and Sky viewing directions?
No
Is there a co-located or nearby instrument for comparison?
No
O3Ext
Decision for O3Ext
Reference (P2s1) vs uncalibrated P242s1 slope of 1.01 and daily profiles looked very good compared to ref instrument
O3Synt
Decision for O3Synt
NO2
Decision for NO2
Reference (P2s1) vs uncalibrated P242s1 slope of 0.997 (nvs4 code) and daily profiles followed diurnal signals excellently compared to ref instrument
SO2
Decision for SO2
Reference (P2s1) vs uncalibrated P242s1 slope of 4, which was a bit high. SO2 profile showed inverse U-shape but still agreed well with reference. SO2 calibration should improve with full field calibration and more data, but seemed OK for clearance.
HCHO
Decision for HCHO
Reference (P2s1) vs uncalibrated P242s1 slope of 0.948 and daily shapes follow same trend, P242s1 shows slightly low values for first few days. Overall good initial agreement.
H2O
Decision for H2O