Decision Summary
Upload-ready calibration protocol overview
Instrument
P234s1
Session
111
Location
Innsbruck
Calibration person
Stefanie Morhenn
CF file
Pandora234s1_CF_v112d20241015.txt
Software version
1.9.5
Calibration vector
-
Reference day
20241115
Overall status
development
O3Ext: Not answeredO3Synt: Not answeredNO2: Not answeredSO2: Not answeredHCHO: Not answeredH2O: Not answered
Instrument
P234s1
Session
111
Events
1109
Figures
3
Action time
18h 34m
Action Timeline
282 action intervals
Duration by Step
Action Summary
| Action |
Events |
Runs |
Aborted |
Time |
| AssignCalFile |
11 |
4 |
1 |
1h 6m |
| Convolution |
177 |
64 |
23 |
7h 31m |
| CreateReference |
378 |
185 |
88 |
9h 20m |
| FOVDetermination |
2 |
1 |
1 |
8s |
| No action |
36 |
0 |
0 |
0s |
| SensitivityCalibration |
499 |
22 |
11 |
35m 14s |
| StrayLight |
3 |
2 |
0 |
18s |
| WavelengthCalibration |
3 |
1 |
0 |
10s |
Session Figures
3 figures from Google Drive/figures
Automatically harvested metadata
Automatically Harvested Metadata
Manual review and decision
Manual Review and Decision
Calibration notes, data-quality findings, and whole-period evaluation.
Data Evaluation
Could there be an offset between VPs?
No
Are there breakpoint-analysis plots or suspicious discontinuities?
No
Do daily figures before and after the new VP look consistent?
No
Is there an AMF dependency for one or more VPs?
No
Is there seasonality, for example negative values in winter?
No
Does the daily shape follow the trop data roughly?
No
If there is a discrepancy, what are the DS and Sky viewing directions?
No
Is there a co-located or nearby instrument for comparison?
No
