Decision Summary
Upload-ready calibration protocol overview
Instrument
P54s1
Session
29
Location
Seoul
Calibration person
Markus Kilian
CF file
Pandora54s1_CF_v29d20210125.txt
Software version
1.8.75
Calibration vector
calV1
Reference day
-
Overall status
development
O3Ext: With CareO3Synt: With CareNO2: With CareSO2: YesHCHO: YesH2O: Yes
Action Timeline
9 action intervalsDuration by Step
Action Summary
| Action | Events | Runs | Aborted | Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AssignCalFile | 3 | 1 | 0 | 8m 40s |
| FieldCalibration | 118 | 8 | 1 | 1h 27m |
| No action | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0s |
Session Figures
2 figures from Google Drive/figuresAutomatically harvested metadata
Automatically Harvested Metadata
Manual review and decision
Manual Review and Decision
Calibration notes, data-quality findings, and whole-period evaluation.Data Evaluation
Could there be an offset between VPs?
No
Are there breakpoint-analysis plots or suspicious discontinuities?
No
Do daily figures before and after the new VP look consistent?
No
Is there an AMF dependency for one or more VPs?
No
Is there seasonality, for example negative values in winter?
No
Does the daily shape follow the trop data roughly?
No
If there is a discrepancy, what are the DS and Sky viewing directions?
No
Is there a co-located or nearby instrument for comparison?
No
O3Ext
Decision for O3Ext
With Care
O3Synt and O3Temp looks good with some jumps in wrms, seasonal O3Temp change. O3Ext almost everything flagged out
O3Synt
Decision for O3Synt
With Care
NO2
Decision for NO2
With Care
correction of MLE based on session 16 into E_MLE, cause NO2 was too high
SO2
Decision for SO2
Yes
corrected MLE of SO2 based on session 16
HCHO
Decision for HCHO
Yes
looks good, E-MLE used
H2O
Decision for H2O
Yes
looks good