Decision Summary
Upload-ready calibration protocol overview
Instrument
P173s1
Session
1
Location
-
Calibration person
-
CF file
-
Software version
1.8.26
Calibration vector
-
Reference day
-
Overall status
development
O3Ext: With CareO3Synt: With CareNO2: YesSO2: With CareHCHO: With CareH2O: With Care
Action Timeline
No start/finish intervals found.No timeline intervals found
Duration by Step
No completed durations found
Action Summary
| Action | Events | Runs | Aborted | Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No actions loaded | ||||
Session Figures
1 figure from Google Drive/figuresAutomatically harvested metadata
Automatically Harvested Metadata
Manual review and decision
Manual Review and Decision
Calibration notes, data-quality findings, and whole-period evaluation.Data Evaluation
Could there be an offset between VPs?
No
Are there breakpoint-analysis plots or suspicious discontinuities?
No
Do daily figures before and after the new VP look consistent?
No
Is there an AMF dependency for one or more VPs?
No
Is there seasonality, for example negative values in winter?
No
Does the daily shape follow the trop data roughly?
No
If there is a discrepancy, what are the DS and Sky viewing directions?
No
Is there a co-located or nearby instrument for comparison?
No
O3Ext
Decision for O3Ext
With Care
AXC looked good, interpolated; ous looks okay, out mostly flagged; temp unusuable: at first inverse-u shape later on an M-shape
O3Synt
Decision for O3Synt
With Care
NO2
Decision for NO2
Yes
E-MLE used
SO2
Decision for SO2
With Care
ok, high unct
HCHO
Decision for HCHO
With Care
E-MLE used, DS&trop data don't always match so good, due to wrms often some days flagged
H2O
Decision for H2O
With Care
most days have an inverse-u shape, but often its asymmetrical, already tried a smaller value