Decision Summary
Upload-ready calibration protocol overview
Instrument
P162s1
Session
5
Location
-
Calibration person
-
CF file
-
Software version
1.8.26
Calibration vector
-
Reference day
-
Overall status
development
O3Ext: Not answeredO3Synt: Not answeredNO2: Not answeredSO2: Not answeredHCHO: Not answeredH2O: Not answered
Action Timeline
No start/finish intervals found.No timeline intervals found
Duration by Step
No completed durations found
Action Summary
| Action | Events | Runs | Aborted | Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No actions loaded | ||||
Session Figures
No session figures found for the loaded instrument/session.No figures loaded
Automatically harvested metadata
Automatically Harvested Metadata
Manual review and decision
Manual Review and Decision
Calibration notes, data-quality findings, and whole-period evaluation.Data Evaluation
Could there be an offset between VPs?
No
Are there breakpoint-analysis plots or suspicious discontinuities?
No
Do daily figures before and after the new VP look consistent?
No
Is there an AMF dependency for one or more VPs?
No
Is there seasonality, for example negative values in winter?
No
Does the daily shape follow the trop data roughly?
No
If there is a discrepancy, what are the DS and Sky viewing directions?
No
Is there a co-located or nearby instrument for comparison?
No
O3Ext
Decision for O3Ext
high uncertainty of 6.9DU; extrapolation was needed, O3T shows invers-U.
O3Synt
Decision for O3Synt
NO2
Decision for NO2
okay, uncertainty of approx 0.03 DU, mostly to Teff. slightly larger total columns as with 1.7 mainly due to trop data usage which looks much more reliable.
SO2
Decision for SO2
not really existing
HCHO
Decision for HCHO
DS looks more 'wavy' than trop, but E-MLE works very good, with small uncertainty. DS data are systematically larger than trop, but follow mostly the daily pattern and day2day variation
H2O
Decision for H2O