Decision Summary
Upload-ready calibration protocol overview
Instrument
P143s1
Session
3
Location
-
Calibration person
BPlace
CF file
-
Software version
1.8.49
Calibration vector
-
Reference day
-
Overall status
development
O3Ext: Not answeredO3Synt: Not answeredNO2: Not answeredSO2: Not answeredHCHO: Not answeredH2O: Not answered
Action Timeline
No start/finish intervals found.No timeline intervals found
Duration by Step
No completed durations found
Action Summary
| Action | Events | Runs | Aborted | Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| No actions loaded | ||||
Session Figures
No session figures found for the loaded instrument/session.No figures loaded
Automatically harvested metadata
Automatically Harvested Metadata
Manual review and decision
Manual Review and Decision
Calibration notes, data-quality findings, and whole-period evaluation.Data Evaluation
Could there be an offset between VPs?
No
Are there breakpoint-analysis plots or suspicious discontinuities?
No
Do daily figures before and after the new VP look consistent?
No
Is there an AMF dependency for one or more VPs?
No
Is there seasonality, for example negative values in winter?
No
Does the daily shape follow the trop data roughly?
No
If there is a discrepancy, what are the DS and Sky viewing directions?
No
Is there a co-located or nearby instrument for comparison?
No
O3Ext
Decision for O3Ext
Reference (P2s1) vs uncalibrated P143s1 slope of 0.98 and daily profiles looked very good compared to ref instrument, they showed a slight bit more variation than normal
O3Synt
Decision for O3Synt
NO2
Decision for NO2
Reference (P2s1) vs uncalibrated P143s1 slope of 0.99 and daily profiles looked very excellent compared to ref instrument
SO2
Decision for SO2
Reference (P2s1) vs uncalibrated P143s1 slope of 0.82 and daily profiles followed ref instrument decently well
HCHO
Decision for HCHO
Reference (P2s1) vs uncalibrated P143s1 slope of 1.05 and magnitude of daily profiles matched ref instrument but trends did not follow well
H2O
Decision for H2O