Decision Summary
Upload-ready calibration protocol overview
Instrument
P111s1
Session
11
Location
Bucharest
Calibration person
Christoph Waldauf
CF file
Pandora111s1_CF_v1d20200910.txt
Software version
p1-8
Calibration vector
-
Reference day
-
Overall status
development
O3Ext: With CareO3Synt: With CareNO2: YesSO2: With CareHCHO: UnusableH2O: Yes
Action Timeline
51 action intervalsDuration by Step
Action Summary
| Action | Events | Runs | Aborted | Time |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AnalyzeBright | 12 | 4 | 4 | 5m 9s |
| AssignCalFile | 4 | 1 | 0 | 9m 37s |
| CreateReference | 2 | 1 | 1 | 9s |
| FieldCalibration | 207 | 39 | 3 | 3h 42m |
| NDFilters | 22 | 2 | 2 | 1m 24s |
| No action | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0s |
| SensitivityCalibration | 52 | 2 | 2 | 2m 46s |
| WavelengthCalibration | 4 | 2 | 2 | 48s |
Session Figures
No session figures found for the loaded instrument/session.No figures loaded
Automatically harvested metadata
Automatically Harvested Metadata
Manual review and decision
Manual Review and Decision
Calibration notes, data-quality findings, and whole-period evaluation.Data Evaluation
Could there be an offset between VPs?
No
Are there breakpoint-analysis plots or suspicious discontinuities?
No
Do daily figures before and after the new VP look consistent?
No
Is there an AMF dependency for one or more VPs?
No
Is there seasonality, for example negative values in winter?
No
Does the daily shape follow the trop data roughly?
No
If there is a discrepancy, what are the DS and Sky viewing directions?
No
Is there a co-located or nearby instrument for comparison?
No
O3Ext
Decision for O3Ext
With Care
T set to climatology - extRef: better Q but inverse U: why?
O3Synt
Decision for O3Synt
With Care
NO2
Decision for NO2
Yes
not too easy to define limits: best guess based on MLE-EMLE-comparison
SO2
Decision for SO2
With Care
low SO2 - used perc 10 rather than 0 - certain days below 0
HCHO
Decision for HCHO
Unusable
Delrin, not calibrated
H2O
Decision for H2O
Yes
seems ok